Here comes the free wireless broadband service!

It’s like the ’90s never left: Billy Crystal hosted the Oscars. Internet IPOs are back. And NetZero is returning with free Internet service —only this time it’s wireless.

United Online Inc. announced Monday that it will offer free wireless Internet service under its NetZero brand, the one that started the free dial-up phenomenon in 1998. The company is backing up the plan with TV, print and online advertisements.

There are plenty of catches with the free plan. United Online isn’t offsetting its costs by making users look at advertising, as it did with its original offer of free dial-up Internet access. The “free” users will be money-losers for the company, United Online Chairman and CEO Mark Goldston said. That means United Online is using the free plan as a way
to lure customers with the hope of upselling them to paying plans, which start at $9.95 per month.

To take advantage of the offer, consumers will need to buy a $50 antenna stick that plugs into a laptop, or a $100 “mobile hotspot” that allows any Wi-Fi equipped device to connect to the Internet. United Online will be selling the devices on the NetZero website.The free accounts are limited to 200 megabytes of data per month— enough for some email and Web surfing, but little else.

Half an hour of full-screen streamed video will eat up the whole month’s allotment. By comparison, AT&T Inc.’s cheapest wireless data plan costs $14.95 per month for slightly more data — 250 megabytes per month — but that
plan is only available for tablets with built-in cellular modems.

When the monthly traffic allotment is exhausted, NetZero cuts off Internet access until the start of the next month, and users are prompted to upgrade to the paid plan.

NetZero will only let users ride free for a year. If they switch to a paid plan, they won’t be able switch back to the free one.

The $9.95 plan will provide 500 megabytes of traffic for a month. For $50 per month, subscribers get 4 gigabytes of data per month. That’s enough for some video watching, but not enough to replace a household’s cable or DSL modem. A Verizon Wireless plan that’s contract-free, like NetZero’s, provides 1 gigabyte for the same price.

United Online doesn’t have a wireless broadband network of its own. Instead, it’s renting capacity on Clearwire Corp.’s network. It’s the same network used by Sprint Nextel Corp. to provide “Sprint 4G” data service. Several cable companies, including Comcast Corp., also resold access to Clearwire’s network under their own brand. However, they’ve pulled out of that deal to focus on a partnership with Verizon Wireless.

Clearwire’s network has a few problems: it’s based on a broadband technology that the rest of the industry has bypassed, which means the selection of compatible devices is limited. Because of the frequency it uses, the signal has difficulty penetrating into buildings. Both Sprint and the cable companies used Sprint’s slower cellular data network as a fallback option, but NetZero’s devices rely only on Clearwire, which means coverage at decent signal strength may be spotty.

Clearwire has stopped investing in this network and is instead raising money for a new network that uses the industry-standard “LTE” technology.

According to Clearwire’s financial statements, it received an average of $6.34 per month in the fourth quarter for each wholesale subscriber, most of whom are “Sprint 4G” smartphone users.

China to Ship Majority of World’s Smartphones in 2012

China is poised to become the world’s leader in smartphone shipments in 2012, according to recent research from IDC. With its sheer size, China nudged the US out of the lead by a hair, but is expected to continue to widen the gap as more of the developing country’s users sign on to the smartphone revolution.

The research firm predicted China will reach 20.7 percent of the world’s smartphone market this year, just ahead of the US’s 20.6 percent. While previous research had shown China taking the lead but then falling behind, IDC maintains this latest trend will only continue to snowball. By 2016, China is expected to leverage 20.2 percent of the global smartphone market, while the US will garner 15.3 percent.

“(China’s) smartphone shipments are expected to take a slim lead over the U.S. in 2012 before the gap widens in the coming years,” said Wong Tech Zhung, senior market analyst with IDC’s Asia/Pacific Client Devices team, in a statement. “There will be no turning back this leadership changeover.”

Meanwhile, India and Brazil are expected to be among the top 5 hottest smartphone markets by 2016, with India growing from its current position at seventh to become the third largest market, followed by Brazil, which currently ranks tenth.

The trends are clearly showing developing countries connecting to the Internet via the palm of your hand. The sheer size of these populations combined with a thirst for smarter technology creates a perfect storm of demand that will be close to rivaling the US. (Source: Red Herring)

The Challenges for Android & the Big Opportunity for Windows Phone

Even though Google’s Android currently dominates the global smartphone market with Apple‘s iOS coming a distant second and other platforms even further behind, it has been a problem child for device manufacturers with the likes of Apple, Microsoft and Oracle suing manufacturers for patent infringement.

Google acquired Motorola primarily to strengthen its patent portfolio and defend its device partners from Apple and Microsoft, but the acquisition has actually increased its patent woes with Google getting dragged into Motorola’s recent patent battles. The acquisition may also have alienated other Android device manufacturers like Samsung and HTC, pushing them further into the arms of Microsoft, which is desperately trying to woo them to the Windows Phone platform.

Microsoft already extracts a patent licensing of around $10 to $15 from most major Android device manufacturers in the U.S. and is expected to generate billions of dollars from Android in the coming years.

Apple, which until recently was demanding injunctions on sales of Android devices by certain manufacturers, seems to have had a change of heart under the leadership of the new CEO, Tim Cook. It now looks to be looking to settle the ongoing patent lawsuits with rivals like Samsung and Motorola in exchange for a licensing fee. 

If these deals go through, Apple could also follow Microsoft’s lead and license its patents to Android manufacturers in exchange for a flat licensing fee of $5 to $15 per Android handset. With more than 750k Android devices being activated daily around the globe, this could turn into a lucrative revenue stream for both Microsoft and Apple and make the devices more expensive to the end of buyer.

Android has been able to capture a majority share of the smartphone market by targeting budget smartphone customers and by being available globally in a variety of options for a variety of customers. However, it has had a series of problems – fragmentation being one of the most serious ones.

If Apple and Microsoft both start extracting a patent licensing fee from Android device manufacturers, it could add up to $15 to $30 per device, which makes the “free” Android OS much more expensive than Windows Phone by Microsoft.

Windows Phone not only offers a uniform experience unencumbered by fragmentation, but it is also backed heavily by Microsoft and offers solid integration with the Windows OS and Xbox. With the impending launch of Windows 8 for tablets, it could become the platform of choice for device manufacturers wanting to offer a complete universe of devices unified by Windows – notebooks, tablets and smartphones – to customers.

This signals a massive opportunity for Microsoft and could be the beginning of the end for Android, which has yet to make a noticeable mark in the tablet market while its problems in the smartphone are mounting.

The Windows Phone Tango could help Microsoft attack the budget smartphone market while Windows Phone Apollo will help it capture market share in the premium smartphone segment. Windows 8 may even become one of the largest players in the tablet OS market, next only to iOS, while Android keeps struggling in the space. (Source: Forbes)

What Dropbox can teach us about cloud computing

Dropbox is the most deceptively simple of services. Place a Dropbox folder on each computer or gadget you own. Drag any file into that folder. A copy of that file automatically appears on every device where you put a Dropbox folder. It’s idiot proof.

But don’t let that simplicity fool you. Dropbox also epitomizes a revolutionary shift that is transforming our relationship to technology and turning the technology industry upside down: Cloud computing.

The “cloud” has been one of Silicon Valley’s biggest buzz phrases for a couple of years now. In the past year, it’s moved from the talk of tech insidersinto the minds of mainstream users.

And in the coming decade, analysts are betting that cloud computing will be the defining trend in technology. Large companies like Oracle, Hewlett-Packard and Oracle are rushing to overhaul their business to sell the tools that enable cloud computing services, while consumers are projected to spend $16 billion annually on cloud services by 2016, according to Gartner research.

But as important as this trend is, I find the concept can still be bewildering to non-techies. Answering the question, “What is cloud computing?” can lead to lots of rambling answers full of industry statistics. None of it really helps the average person understand what’s different about the cloud, and why this is all happening now. And most important, why they should care.

“The cloud is everywhere now in our personal lives,” said Ray Wang, CEO of Constellation Research. “Because of cloud computing, we’re basically assuming that everything you’re doing digitally is available somewhere else through the Internet.”

To understand why, I thought it would be helpful to put a single service under the microscope to see what it tells us about cloud computing. I couldn’t think of a better company than Dropbox.

Founded in 2007, the rise of San Francisco-based Dropbox tracks almost perfectly with the cloud’s move from the fringes of tech into its defining trend. Last September, Dropbox scored an astounding $250 million in venture capital and currently has about 50 million users.

Just last month, Dropbox was voted “startup of the year” at the annual Crunchies Awards. But it also faces enormous competition in the file sharing space from other startups such as Box.net, CloudMe, SugarSync, Egnyte, and big players such as Apple and Google, which are both actively expanding the ability of users to share files.

The company was created by two MIT grads, Drew Houston and Arash Ferdowsi, who were frustrated about having to email each other’s files.

Let’s start right there. Once, the problem of how to move files between users or gadgets would have been an issue for only the highest end users. Maybe the business road warrior on the go, or the most sophisticated programmers.

But around 2007, this started to become a problem for the average person for several reasons. Many of us now had more than one computing device, compared to a decade earlier when most people had one. As of 2010, 124 million adults in the United States had more than one device connected to the Internet, according to IDC, a technology research firm, which projected that number would climb to 184 million by 2016.

On top of that, these devices were coming in many different shapes and sizes. In the late 1990s, most of us probably just had one PC running Windows. But now we might have a PC at work, a Mac at home, and a smartphone running Android or iOS, and possibly a tablet. So moving a single file between all those devices, and changing it into different formats quickly, could be a pain.

“The cool thing about the Internet is that everything is going to be connected,” said Sujay Jaswa, vice president of business development and sales for Dropbox. “But it’s less interesting if all your stuff is not there and you’re not able to share it. And all these individual pieces to technology are magical, but they’re also incompatible.”

All of these devices have also allowed us to become far more mobile with work. According to market research firm IDC, the number of workers worldwide who are considered mobile – that is, working in more than one location – has climbed from 758.6 million in 2006 to 1 billion in 2010 with a projection of 1.3 billion in 2013, about 37 percent of all workers. All that shuffling around means we need more help moving our digital stuff from gadget to gadget.

Suddenly, the problem encountered by Dropbox’s founders wasn’t just theirs. It was a problem for more than a billion people.

A service like Dropbox wouldn’t have been as valuable a decade ago, said ChenLi Wang, team leader of business and sales operations at Dropbox. “Now people are working across many geographic regions and we’re in a much different place than we were five or 10 years ago,” he said.

Before services like Dropbox, we were able to move files between computers using thumb drives for small files, or by logging into a server to transfer really big files. But those are both a pain when you have to do it constantly, especially for the increasingly large multimedia files we create.

Still, even just five years ago, Dropbox would have a limited market for another reason: Networks were too darn slow. Uploading stuff to the Internet, especially large files, could be a slow, agonizing process. But over the past several years, network speeds have dramatically increased.

Back in 2004, less than 30 percent of U.S. homes had broadband connections, according to the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. Now Pew says that percentage has jumped to 60 percent.

In addition, the number of people in North America using speedy 3G networks for their mobile devices has climbed from 20 percent in 2007 to 54 percent in 2011, according to Morgan Stanley research.

These three pieces – multiple gadgets, mobile workforce, faster networks – wouldn’t have been enough f
That dramatic decline gave us more space to store our stuff. More importantly, it led companies like Amazon to sell space on their own servers to startups like Dropbox. That meant that Dropbox could start for very little money.or Dropbox if one other piece didn’t fall into place: Over the past decade, the price of digital storage declined dramatically. By one estimate, from Clearwell Systems, an IT research firm, the price of storing 1 gigabyte of information fell from $20 in 2000 to 10 cents in 2010.

And that meant Dropbox can offer its basic service – 2GB of storage-for free.

The trends that have given rise to cloud computing are projected to accelerate over the next decade. That’s bad new

s if you sell disk drives or servers. But it’s going to create a world where virtually every bit of our digital lives are available everywhere instantaneously.

And that, of course, is very good news for Dropbox.

How the cloud became hot

Four major trends came together in the past several years to turn the cloud into one of tech’s most important trends, and make services like Dropbox possible:

1. We have more devices (phones, laptops, tablets), so we have more reasons to access files on all those gadgets.

2. People started working outside the office more, making it even more important to keep those files up to date.

3. Networks got faster, making it easier to share files.

4. Storage got much cheaper, making cloud-based services more economical.

By Chris O’Brien (c) 2012 the San Jose Mercury News (San Jose, Calif.)


A look at the third generation iPad

Apple CEO Tim Cook with unveiling new iPad

 

By Nathan Olivarez-Giles

Los Angeles Times

Apple’s new iPad is here and we’ve reported the full details on specs, but you might be wondering what it looks like, how it responds and whether or not it’s worth dumping your first generation iPad or iPad 2 for an upgrade.

While we can’t answer all of those questions today (I’ll be writing up a full review of the new iPad soon), my colleague David Sarno shot some video (see above) and shared some first impressions from the floor of San Francisco’s Yerba Buena Center for the Arts where Apple unveiled its third-generation tablet on Wednesday.

For Video click here

Sarno said the new iPad’s retina display is a big improvement in resolution and detail over the first two generation Apple tablets, comparing the new iPad to holding an HD TV set in your hands.

The new iPad technically has a higher than high-definition display with a resolution of 2048 x 1536 pixels, which is twice the resolution of the first two iPad models, which have 1,024-by-768-pixel resolution touchscreens.

The new display earns its “retina display” name because it offers up a density of 326 dots per inch, or dpi. Dpi is a measurement of how many pixels can fit into a square inch and anything with a dpi of 300 or greater is considered a retina display because individual pixels aren’t distinguishable to the human eye when a device is held about 10 to 12 inches away.

Sarno also said that the new iPad’s improved graphics processing unit is noticeably more powerful that what was seen on the iPad 2, having no problem handling complicated 3D graphics, such as games. Books look a lot clearer too, he said.

The new iPad packs an “A5X” chip set with the same dual-core processor as the iPad 2 combined with a new quad-core graphics unit that Apple says will offer four times the graphics performance of its predecessor.

In the video Sarno shot on his cellphone at the unveiling, we can hear others at the event saying that the new iPad appears to respond faster to touch input and that the screen looks “fantastic.”

Of course, seeing something on the show floor and living with it isn’t always the same, so stay tuned to the Technology blog for the new iPad review in the coming days.

Mobile World Congress 2012: smartphone roundup

(From Engadget)

Mobile World Congress is a dignified affair held yearly in Barcelona that companies take very seriously. For example, unlike CES, there are lots and lots of suits — after all, this isa congress. Here, some of the most unique and desirable handsets meet the eyes of press, analysts and buyers for the very first time. Accordingly, anxieties were high among company leaders as they put their best foot forward and held their breath for the first round of impressions. This year’s show has been a wild ride, and we’ve seen many devices stretch the boundaries of our imagination. There were more than a few stunners, and as the dust settles, companies such as HTC, Nokia, LG, Huawei and Asus can all hold their heads high. Join us after the break as we reminisce the most notable smartphones from Mobile World Congress.

HTC One X

This past year, many smartphones from HTC fell just short of being ideal. The One Xis proof that the company has listened to the critiques, and oh, how times have changed. This incredibly slim handset features an understated yet elegant design, yet inside it packs a Tegra 3 SoC with a quad-core 1.5GHz CPU (or a Snapdragon S4 with a dual-core 1.5GHz processor in AT&T’s variant), a beautiful 4.7-inch 720p Super LCD display, 16GB of internal storage and an oh-so-desirable f/2.0, 8 megapixel camera that effortlessly captures beautiful imagery at a rapid pace. It features Ice Cream Sandwich with a Sense 4.0 overlay that’s much less obtrusive than previous versions, and our interactions with the phone were buttery smooth. Put simply, the HTC One X stole the show at Mobile World Congress. So long as battery life is up to par, it’ll set the pace for every smartphone to follow in its wake.

HTC One S

The HTC One Sis positioned as the company’s mid-range device, but in all seriousness, it could very well be an ideal smartphone for anyone that finds the One X’s 4.7-inch display a bit excessive. It shares many of the same design cues as its larger sibling, and HTC’s attention to detail is very apparent — for example, when swiping across the screen, your finger will effortlessly cascade off the glass. It features a 1.5GHz dual-core Snapdragon S4, a 4.3-inch qHD Super AMOLED display, a similar 16GB of storage and the same 8MP camera that’s found in the One X.

Nokia PureView 808

The PureView 808 from Nokia won the official Best of Show award here at Mobile World Congress, and while the device has undoubtedly moved the cameraphone to a new echelon, we’ve no doubt there was a bit of Euro bias in the vote. Put simply, the PureView 808 is a middling (and slightly clumsy) device with an amazing 41-megapixel camera. It features a 1.3GHz CPU, a 4-inch ClearBlack AMOLED display at 640 x 360, and packs quadband GSM and pentaband 3G connectivity — all in a device that runs Symbian Belle. That said, yeah, we want one.

Huawei Ascend D Quad

Could you have ever dreamed that one of the standout smartphones of Mobile World Congress would be from Huawei? We’ve known for a while now that the scrappy competitor had ambitions to join the top-tier ranks of smartphone manufacturers, but it wasn’t until we laid our hands on the device that we realized just how serious (and capable) the company was. Paling only in comparison to the HTC One lineup, the Huawei Ascend D Quadboasts some of the finest aesthetics that we’ve seen at the show. It features a 1.5GHz quad-core CPU, a 4.5-inch IPS display with 720p resolution, an 8MP camera, quadband GSM, pentaband WCDMA and, wouldn’t you know it, a big bite of Ice Cream Sandwich.

LG Optimus Vu

The Optimus Vuhas literally met the boundaries for how wide a smartphone can be. It’s a short and broad device that’s undoubtedly LG’s answer to the Galaxy Note from Samsung. It features an excellent 5-inch IPS display with a rather unique 4:3 aspect ratio. While it may appear a bit clumsy, we found its width to be quite ideal for text input on the virtual keyboard. Naturally, it also features stylus input, though we still prefer the Galaxy Note in this arena. Internally, there’s a 1.5GHz dual-core CPU, an 8 megapixel camera and a 2,080mAh battery. At just 8.5mm, it’s an incredibly thin device, through you’ll certainly want to test drive this one in your pants pocket before making the commitment.

ASUS Padfone

The ASUS Padfone is certainly one of the more unique handsets to rear its head at MWC. While we question its mass-market appeal, it has a coolness factor that can’t be ignored. The phone is designed to be slipped into an accompanying 10-inch tablet, and naturally, any work done on the slate remains available once the handset is on its own. The tablet accessory is also capable of charging the Padfone and, get this, the tablet’s keyboard accessory alsoholds a battery that’ll charge both the tablet and phone. Yep, it gets complicated rather quickly, but there’s also a certain amount of elegance to the setup that makes us smile. The Padfone itself features a dual-core 1.5GHz Snapdragon S4, a 4.3-inch Super AMOLED qHD display and its internal storage will vary between 16GB and 64GB.

Acer CloudMobile

It’ll be interesting to see how the Acer CloudMobilestacks up against the competition once it hits the market in Q3 of this year, but for the moment, it holds the potential to be a strong contender in the mid-tier. It’s not the most refined device we’ve ever come across, but we’re incredibly fond of its pixel-dense 4.3-inch 720p display and its top-notch viewing angles. The phone includes a Snapdragon S4 SoC with a dual-core 1.5GHz CPU, along with an 8 megapixel camera that’s said — but not confirmed — to feature zero shutter lag with continuous shot-to-shot performance.

LG Optimus 4X HD

The sequel to the Optimus 2X is here, and it asks to be called the Optimus 4X HD. As the name implies, it now packs a Tegra 3 SoC with a quad-core 1.5GHz CPU and a large 4.7-inch IPS display with 720p resolution, along with an 8 megapixel primary camera. While there’s no doubt plenty of power with this handset, LG’s software struck us as rather slow and cumbersome — which is, sadly, all too reminiscent of the Optimus 2X. Nonetheless, we were rather fond of the device’s build quality and its display, but further software optimization will be necessary to get this one off the ground.

Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G

It’s no game-changer, but there’s still plenty to love about the Galaxy S Blaze 4G. It takes many of the design cues of the original Galaxy S lineup and crams Galaxy S II innards into the handset. It features a 1.5GHz dual-core Snapdragon S3, a 4-inch Super AMOLED display, a 5 megapixel camera and will support T-Mobile’s 42Mbps HSPA+ network. Once T-Mobile lowers the $150 price to a more palatable level, it promises to be a very strong mid-tier contender.

Nokia Lumia 610

It’s difficult to stir our passions with a low-end device, and just to be clear, value-conscious consumers will likely find better options elsewhere, but Nokia has proven that it’s ready to take Windows Phone down to a level that’s accessible to a larger audience. That on its own makes the Lumia 610worth a humble mention. It features an 800MHz CPU, 3.7-inch WVGA TFT display, a 5MP camera and quadband GSM / EDGE / WCDMA.

Xolo X900

What discussion of potential game-changers from Mobile World Congress would be fully complete without Intel and its new lineup of Medfield chips for smartphones? We happened to grab some time with the Xolo X900, a slab that’s based on the 1.6GHz Z2560. While the device is currently destined for India, it offers some worthwhile insights to what we might expect from handsets that’ll land closer to home. We found performance to be plenty responsive on the stock Gingerbread phone, but we’re most intrigued by the battery life claims — for example, the phone’s relatively meager 1,460mAh cell is said to last up to 14 days on standby and offer up to eight hours of talk time, all thanks to the chip’s advanced power management features. The Xolo X900 itself features a 4-inch, 1024 x 600 LCD screen, an 8 megapixel camera and is said to ship in Q2.

Windows 8 FAQ

Windows 8 Theme

What is Microsoft releasing today?

Starting today, you can download the Consumer Preview beta version of Windows 8 (as well as the beta of Windows Server 8 and the beta of Visual Studio 11). The Consumer Preview version is free and available to the general public to try out.

Where can I download the beta?

Right here: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-8/download

Does that include the ARM version?

No, here’s no ARM-based beta you can download today. Microsoft has said it will make pre-loaded Windows/ARM devices available to developers soon.

When will Windows 8 be available to purchase?
Microsoft hasn’t put an exact date on it, but many PC and other hardware makers have said that they expect to have Windows 8 products in stores by either the third or fourth quarter of 2012, which would mean they’ll land in time for the Holiday 2102 shopping season.

What features discussed today differ from the Windows 8 developer preview available since last year?

A few of the highlights from today, not previously available in test versions of Win8, include:

  • The replacement of the traditional ‘Start’ with a right-click Start Preview function.
  • A new ‘Microsoft Account’ to manage passwords and account information — this is likely a rebranding/replacement for Windows Live.
  • New Microsoft apps, including People, Mail, Calendaring, Messaging and SkyDrive, and others, available for free (for now, at least) in the new Windows 8 app store.
  • Mouse and touch gestures to zoom and resize the view, launch ‘Charms,’ and more.

What are the minimum specs to run the Windows 8 preview?

  • 1.0GHz or faster processor
  • 1GB RAM (32-bit) or 2 GB RAM (64-bit)
  • 16GB available hard disk space (32-bit) or 20GB (64-bit)
  • DirectX 9 graphics
  • 1,024×768 minimum native screen resolution (1,366×768 for the Snap functionality)

Do I have to have a touchscreen?

Despite the heavy emphasis on touch, Window 8 will work on traditional laptop/desktop hardware as well.

Do I have to use the Metro interface?

While most of the Windows 8 demos we’ve seen make heavy use of the mobile-friendly Metro UI, there’s a traditional Windows desktop view available as well (but not on the ARM version). Some apps, however, will only run in Metro, and are designed to run either full-screen or docked to one side.

How is Microsoft workingXbox into Windows 8?

Through a new Xbox Live companion app, Microsoft wants to connect your PC, Xbox, and even Windows phone in new ways. You’ll be able to stream video from a PC to an Xbox, access your Xbox friends list and more.

Where can I read more about Windows 8? Where can I read more about Windows 8?

Our liveblog commentary is here; our hands-on preview of Windows 8 is here (Source: CNET)

Intel’s mobile plan: Zero to Hero

Intel CEO Paul Otelleii show inoff Orange.new phone at MWC

The hottest smartphone maker at this year’s Mobile World Congress in Barcelona isn’t Samsung, HTC, Nokia or Motorola. It’s Intel.

You didn’t know Intel designed phones? Neither did most people until the chipmaking behemoth announced Monday night that it designed a top-of-the-line smartphone for the global telecom giant Orange.

It all started about a year ago, when extremely frustrated top brass at Intel decided the company could never convince anyone that its chips would work on mobile phones — a field dominated by mobile chip designing rival ARM (ARMH) — without proving it. PowerPoint presentations, no matter how impressive, just weren’t persuading phone manufacturers and carriers.

So Intel hired several hundred engineers from all over Silicon Valley and opened up a state-of-the-art phone-making business right inside the company.

Late last year, Intel began to show off the fruit of its labors to the same folks who used to be subjected to slide presentations. The device — designed entirely and exclusively at Intel’s Santa Clara headquarters — has all the key features of modern smartphones, runs Google’s (GOOG, Fortune 500) Android operating system beautifully, and looks remarkably like Apple’s iPhone 4S.

That shouldn’t be surprising. Intel’s head of mobility, Mike Bell, worked at Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500) for 17 years and worked on the iPhone project before leaving for Palm.

“Our device is fully buzzword-compliant,” said Bell, in an interview on Tuesday. “Intel is a computing company, and these devices are becoming handheld computers. It’s natural for us to get into this space.”

Intel finally ups the ante in mobile

Intel built a few thousand of the phones and started handing them out to any and all potential partners. The phone did what the PowerPoint couldn’t: In addition to Orange, Indian carrier Lava is planning on shipping a device based on Intel’s reference design next quarter, and Lenovo launched a similar phone last month.

It has also helped to finally get Intel’s chips inside some important devices that Intel didn’t itself design. Motorola Mobility (MMI), which is being acquired by Google, announced last month that all of its future devices will run on Intel chips. And Chinese smartphone giant ZTE said Monday that it too would soon begin to ship phones with Intel inside.

So now that Intel is a successful phone maker, will it continue in that realm? Or will it focus more intently on chip design? Probably a little bit of both.

“Our plan is that with every new generation of chip, we’ll build a state-of-the-art reference device,” Bell said. “If customers like what they see, we’ll certainly support that.”

It’s actually not such a new strategy. Three decades ago, when Intel had to convince emerging personal computer companies that it could make PC processors — a laughable thought now that it dominates 80% of that market — Intel actually designed whole motherboards in house and showed them off to potential partners. The same was true for laptops in the 1990s.

Like today with mobile phones, some companies liked the boards and notebook computers so much that Intel continued to secretly make them for a while and brand them under the PC manufacturer’s name.

With ARM claiming that its chips are on 95% of all phones, Intel still has a lot to prove. But whether Intel can power smartphones is no longer a question.  (Source: CNN Money)

Android 5.0 could come in fall, Google exec implies

BARCELONA — Google is is not saying much about the next version of Android, which has been rumored to be coming to a smartphone near you by early summer.

It’s now more likely that the new mobile OS will be rolled out in the fall, according to comments made by Hiroshi Lockheimer, Google’s vice president of engineering for mobile, at the at the Mobile World Congress here. But he still said little about the capabilities of Android 5.0.

“After Android 4 comes 5, and we haven’t announced the timing yet, which we’re still sorting out,” Lockheimer said in an interview with Computerworld on Monday. “There’s a lot of engineering work still behind it — and there’s also the question of how to time it.

“In general,” he added. “the Android release cadence is one major release a year with some maintenance releases that are substantial still.”

That statement would imply a fall 2012 release of Android 5.0, given that Android 4.0 was released last November, he acknowledged.

Nonetheless, he said, “Having said that, we’re flexible. The [timing of releases] is not what drives us; it’s innovation and offering users a great experience.”

Lockheimer wouldn’t divulge the dessert that Android 5.0 will be named after, following Ice Cream Sandwich (ICS) for 4.0. Google is already getting many suggestions for desserts that begin with the letter “J” for the version after Android 5.0, he said.

Google is still basking in the glory of Android 4.0, which was well-received by developers and users.

The large Google booth here in the back corner of a major exhibition hall has been crowded with visitors looking at ICS-related applications from dozens of Google partners.

For example, Wyse Technologies uses Android Beam technology to use the NFC software in ICS to initiate file transfers between devices.

Wyse workers brought two Galaxy Nexus phones together to start the process. The first phone was brought near the second to give it permission to access a file kept in the cloud or on a PC. The download of the file to the second phone was done over Wi-Fi, though it could also use 3G or another wireless signal. NFC is too constrained to transfer the file, the Wyse workers explained.

Lockheimer said Android Beam has attracted dozens of applications, many now available in the Android Market.

One of the apps allows two users to share a video by bringing two NFC phones close together, even mid-stream of a video clip. StumbleUpon demonstrated a similar technology inside the Google booth.

Lockheimer ticked off a list of popular ICS improvements, including data usage and battery usage meters and widgets on the home screen.

Even though ICS was center stage at Google’s booth, many users have expressed frustration that its upgrades do not yet run on devices running older Android versions.

Lockheimer acknowledged the frustration over receiving ICS upgrades in a timely manner, which was why the Android Upgrade Alliance was announced at last year’s Google I/O conference. The premise of the group was that Android manufacturers and carriers would provide timely upgrades for devices during the OS’s first at 18 months on the market.

“The alliance is definitely making a difference,” Lockheimer said. “We’re making the upgrade process better and are passionate about it. There’s a lot of progress being made towards making upgrades smoother.”

But Lockheimer added that “getting upgrades to users is very complicated. By the time you add up all the players, it’s a big pipeline, a big assembly line, with lots of parts. Everyone needs to be working in tight coordination.”

Lockheimer wouldn’t divulge specifics of the next version of Android, other than to say it will do a variety of general things that sounded like the goals of any successful operating system.

“Things we will add in the future are around simplicity and power,” he said. “That’s an ongoing theme at Google and increasingly so.”

Those simultaneous directions are meant to satisfy both sophisticated Android users and beginners, he explained.

“We’re proud of our work in the in the OS, and we want to offer a polished experience [in the future] that’s even faster and smoother.” he said.

“We call that ‘butter,’ which can take many forms. [Future versions of Android] should run even faster and smoother, and even butter-er.” (Lockheimer laughed at himself for his use of that word.)

Android was founded on the principle of openness, which means it has been customized by carriers and manufacturers alike to provide unique distinguishing characteristics, Lockheimer noted.

Google is fine with the fact that some users want plain vanilla Android on their smartphones and tablets, while carriers, makers and some users want the added layers that provide customization, he added.

“Having both traits [plain vanilla and highly customized phones] is a strength of Android,” Lockheimer said.

“How did Android get here? It was through openness, and by the way you can customize it. As long you don’t mess with its compatibility, you can customize it. That’s the secret of our success. [Android makers and carriers] don’t all want to do the same thing as one another, and they want to innovate,” he added

At the same time, Lockheimer said Google is aware that “some users prefer our true Google experience” which is one reason that ICS includes the ability to strip off many apps and functions added by manufacturers and carriers.

“If you prefer plain ICS, you can disable the [added] apps,” he said. “One slice does not fit all. This way you can have your cake and eat it too.” (Source: computerworld)

Mobile devices change web access patterns, says study

Tablets have emerged as ‘fourth screen’ leading the change in ways that consumers access information, says a comScore report

Mobile devices — smartphones and tablets — that had a windfall sales year in 2011 are shaping an online landscape in which consumption patterns are rapidly changing, according to research agency comScore’s report, ‘2012-Mobile Future in Focus,’ which was released on February 23.

Based on mobile markets, primarily the U.S., the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Japan and Canada, the report lays out a road map for trends likely this year. Central to the theme is the spike in the use of mobile devices — smartphones and tablets — as a gateway to access the web.

The trend is most visible in Singapore, where it is estimated that mobile devices account for nearly 11.5 per cent of the web traffic.

The U.K. and the U.S. come second and third at 9.5 and 8.2 per cent. India figures eighth in the list, with 5.1 per cent of the web traffic through mobile devices. With nearly 100 million internet users, in terms of actual numbers, India should rank as one of the biggest markets in terms of potential.

Health apps popular

Health ranks as one of the key segments of interest for smart mobile device users. In the U.S. as well as key European segments, access to the web through Apps gained parity with access through mobile web browsers, the report notes. Health Apps is the fastest-growing mobile Apps category, followed by retail and other e-commerce applications.

Conversely, other classical web applications like the web mail and weather services are seeing a lack of interest.

Access to news

The report lays stress on news consumption in markets where newspaper circulation is being challenged by online consumption. (In India, the scenario is different as of now.) It points to a change in the consumer pattern on the devices the readers used to access news through the course of the day. The use of smartphones and tablets peaked through the course of the day, whereas access to news through the traditional desktop computer seems to be on the wane. This could be one of the opportunities for publishers to look at this year.

New category of consumers

Defining a new category of consumers — “digital omnivores” who engage online through multiple touch points through the day — the report has predicted that 2012 could well be the year of a pitched battle among mobile operating systems (OS). Consumers in the U.S. and Europe reckon that network connectivity and strengths of the mobile operating system are key considerations before buying a smartphone.

The main contenders are Google’s Android and Apple’s iOS, but the report notes that Research In Motion’s BlackBerry OS, which is making a comeback of sorts, and Microsoft’s Windows Mobile, which is trying to reach out with the Metro interface that integrates the desktop and the mobile experience, could set things up this year.

(Source: The Hindu)